I've wondered about how it's possible that two people can look at the same garden and one complain that 'there's nothing there' or 'what a mess' while the other extols its transporting beauty? I think the difference might be how we all differ from our points of perspectives on: design. Gertrude Jekyll was a designer, if nothing else, while Henry Mitchell might have been more of a commentator on the human condition, from the platform of a garden (in between the lines). I say this for the sake of argument, because those two (and the rest of us) often overlap with respect to the opinions that divide us. Another garden notable for timeless beauty - but perhaps not at first glance for design - is Celia Thaxter's garden - but to digress - would we really prefer a Japanese garden of sand and two rocks or Thaxter's summer hullabaloo of hollyhocks at the gate while hoards of poppies marched beyond the gate down to the sea, as portrayed in Childe Hassam's paintings of her garden?
I hope I'll be forgiven for the foregoing opinions, because they're only meant to be rhetorical devices for admiring the gardens of Gertrude Jekyll and Celia Thaxter in the light of each other.
Sooo - I can't recommend Celia Thaxter's "An Island Garden" highly enough:
https://digital.library.upenn.... - illustrated by the American impressionist, Childe Hassam.
And Henry Mitchell -
https://www.nytimes.com/1994/0...
karen
Oella
ps - Celia Thaxter's "Plan of Garden with List of Flowers" can be found right after the index near the beginning of her book - fun to compare with a Jekyll garden design - as I once heard a landscape designer lecturing at the Smithsonian say (words to the effect) - [our gardens all have an axis dividing it down the middle like that of Versailles (designed more for access through garden by horse and buggy than for moseying around by foot - hence begonias as far as the eye could see)] -
https://en.chateauversailles.f...